Was Parliament Justified In Killing the King? :: essays research papers

Despite the simplistic fact that King Charles I was the legally lawful leader of England, sevens was more than justified in executing Charles I due to the divergent and passionate views of law and demeanor between the people and the big businessman in politics, society, and religion. Parliament never want a position where they could control England with full-fledged power. They simply wanted abounding limitations on the kings power that would guarantee the people authorized rights that the king cannot take a federal agency, which juxtaposes the belief of divine right. Parliament tried numerous ways to create a structured administration where the kings power was restricted and Parliament, including the people that they represented, was given a voice in government but their countless tries were futile and a disappointment. Preceding the civic War and many times after it, Parliament tried to burn d give the king to present to him their ideas of how power should be distributed a nd used. They came up with laws and regulations to resolve semipolitical problems with the king, such as the Petition of Rights, Nineteen Propositions, and Grand Remonstrance. The king declined to jazz these laws as genuine laws. He either signed and disregarded it or he absolutely refused to bother himself with the minor complaints of Parliament. This eventually led to the purpose that King Charles I was the type of man who could not be sure with the legal promises he made to his people. The worries of Parliament were not seen as a major concern of his and he repudiated to consider any negotiations with whatever Parliament had to say. The kings intractable ways caused Parliament to break away from his power before England became a place of political disaster. Although the obstinate king refused to recognize Parliaments authorized power and influence, he turn his back on his Protestant country to form foreign alliances against his have people. If that wasnt ghastly enough, the king acted in an outrageous and appalling way when he put religion into the conflict and made it worse. He asked for soldiers assistance from the Catholic pope and agreed to certain terms that could book shattered his already-destabilized country. The king denied the fact that he had been defeated by his own subjects, and he did anything he could do in his power to prevent the damage of his throne. It is not right of a true and legitimate king to send packing his people and betray them in such a horrendous and impossible way as to destroy the pride of his countrys religion.